Data from: The early-life environment and individual plasticity in life history

  • Ornela de Gasperin (Creator)
  • Ana Duarte (Creator)
  • Sinead English (Creator)
  • Alfredo Attisano (Creator)
  • Rebecca M Kilner (Creator)

Dataset

Description

We tested whether the early-life environment can influence the extent of individual plasticity in a life history trait. We asked: can the early-life environment explain why, in response to the same adult environmental cue, some individuals invest more than others in current reproduction? And can it additionally explain why investment in current reproduction trades off against survival in some individuals, but is positively correlated with survival in others? We addressed these questions using the burying beetle, which breeds on small carcasses and sometimes carries phoretic mites. These mites breed alongside the beetle, on the same resource, and are a key component of the beetle’s early-life environment. We exposed female beetles to mites twice during their lives: during their development as larvae, and again as adults during their first reproductive event. We measured investment in current reproduction by quantifying average larval mass, and recorded the female’s lifespan after breeding to quantify survival. We found no effect of either developing or breeding alongside mites on female reproductive investment, on her lifespan, nor did developing alongside mites influence her size. In post hoc analyses, where we considered number of mites (rather than their mere presence/absence) on the female’s adult breeding event, we found that females invested more in current reproduction when exposed to greater mite densities during reproduction, but only if they had been exposed to mites during development as well. Otherwise they invested less in larvae at greater mite densities. Furthermore, females that had developed with mites exhibited a trade-off between investment in current reproduction and future survival, whereas these traits were positively correlated in females that had developed without mites. The early-life environment thus generates individual variation in life history plasticity. We discuss whether this is because mites influence the resources available to developing young or serve as important environmental cues.
Date made available4 Jan 2019
PublisherDryad
Geographical coverageEngland

Cite this