Variation in the oral processing of everyday meals is associated with fullness and meal size; a potential nudge to reduce energy intake

  • ML Bosworth (Creator)
  • CG Forde (Contributor)
  • PJ Rogers (Contributor)
  • ML"] ["Matthew Bosworth", "Bosworth (Contributor)
  • N Martin (Contributor)
  • N Godinot (Contributor)
  • E Van Den Heuvel (Contributor)
  • Jeffrey Michael Brunstrom (Contributor)
  • D Ferriday (Contributor)
  • FJ Mercer Moss (Contributor)
  • SL Appleton (Contributor)

Dataset

Description

Raw data for the paper entitled "Variation in the oral processing of everyday meals is associated with fullness and meal size; a potential nudge to reduce energy intake". Abstract: Laboratory studies have demonstrated that experimental manipulations of oral processing can have a marked effect on energy intake. Here, we explored whether variations in oral processing across a range of unmodified everyday meals could affect post-meal fullness and meal size. In Study 1, female participants (N=12) attended the laboratory over 20 lunchtime sessions to consume a 400-kcal portion of a different commercially available pre-packaged meal. Prior to consumption, expected satiation was assessed. During each meal, oral processing was characterised using; i) video-recordings of the mouth and ii) real-time measures of plate weight. Hunger and fullness ratings were elicited pre- and post-consumption, and for a further three hours. Foods that were eaten slowly had higher expected satiation and delivered more satiation and satiety. Building on these findings, in Study 2 we selected two meals (identical energy density) from Study 1 that were equally liked but maximised differences in oral processing. On separate days, male and female participants (N=24) consumed a 400-kcal portion of either the ‘fast’ or ‘slow’ meal followed by an ad libitum meal (either the same food or a dessert). When continuing with the same food, participants consumed less of the slow meal. Further, differences in food intake during the ad libitum meal were not compensated at a subsequent snacking opportunity an hour later. Together, these findings suggest that variations in oral processing across a range of unmodified everyday meals can affect fullness after consuming a fixed portion and can also impact meal size. Modifying food form to encourage increased oral processing (albeit to a lesser extent than in experimental manipulations) might represent a viable target for food manufacturers to help to nudge consumers to manage their weight.
Date made available8 Apr 2015
PublisherUniversity of Bristol

Keywords

  • Nudge theory
  • Satiation
  • Satiety
  • Appetite
  • Oral processing behaviours
  • Expected satiation
  • Liking

Cite this