2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis

DCVAS Study Group, Cristina Ponte, Peter C Grayson, Joanna C Robson, Ravi Suppiah, Katherine Bates Gribbons, Andrew Judge, Anthea Craven, Sara Khalid, Andrew Hutchings, Richard A Watts, Peter A Merkel*, Raashid A Luqmani

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

64 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate updated classification criteria for giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate items, 2) prospective collection of candidate items present at the time of diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based risk classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set.

RESULTS: The development data set consisted of 518 cases of GCA and 536 comparators. The validation data set consisted of 238 cases of GCA and 213 comparators. Age ≥50 years at diagnosis was an absolute requirement for classification. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: positive temporal artery biopsy or temporal artery halo sign on ultrasound (+5); erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥50 mm/hour or C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/liter (+3); sudden visual loss (+3); morning stiffness in shoulders or neck, jaw or tongue claudication, new temporal headache, scalp tenderness, temporal artery abnormality on vascular examination, bilateral axillary involvement on imaging, and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography activity throughout the aorta (+2 each). A patient could be classified as having GCA with a cumulative score of ≥6 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.88-0.94) with a sensitivity of 87.0% (95% CI 82.0-91.0%) and specificity of 94.8% (95% CI 91.0-97.4%).

CONCLUSION: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR GCA classification criteria are now validated for use in clinical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1881-1889
Number of pages9
JournalArthritis and Rheumatology
Volume74
Issue number12
Early online date8 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnostic imaging
  • Rheumatology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Temporal Arteries/diagnostic imaging
  • Blood Sedimentation
  • Biopsy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this