2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Microscopic Polyangiitis

Ravi Suppiah, Joanna C Robson, Peter Grayson, Cristina Ponte, Anthea Craven, Sara Khalid, Andrew Judge, Andrew Hutchings, Peter Merkel*, Raashid A. Luqmani, Richard Watts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

114 Citations (Scopus)
662 Downloads (Pure)


Objective: To develop and validate classification criteria for microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).
Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in five phases: i) Identification of candidate items using consensus methodology; ii) Prospective data collection of candidate items present at the time of diagnosis; iii) Data-driven reduction of candidate items; iv) Expert panel review of cases to define the reference diagnosis; v) Derivation of a points-based risk score for disease classification in a development set using lasso logistic regression with subsequent validation of performance characteristics in an independent set of cases and comparators.
Results: The development set for MPA consisted of 149 cases of MPA and 409 comparators. The validation set consisted of an additional 142 cases of MPA and 414 comparators. From 91 candidate items, regression analysis identified 10 items for MPA, 6 of which were retained. The weighting of final criteria items was: i) pANCA or anti-MPO ANCA positivity (+6), ii) Pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (+3), iii) Lung fibrosis or interstitial lung disease (+3), iv) Sino-nasal symptoms or signs (-3), v) cANCA or anti-PR3 ANCA positivity (-1), and vi) Eosinophil count ≥ 1x109/L (-4). After excluding mimics of vasculitis, a patient with a diagnosis of small- or medium-vessel vasculitis could be classified as MPA with a cumulative score of ≥ 5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation dataset, the sensitivity was 91% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 85-95%) and the specificity was 94% (95% CI 92-96%).
Conclusion: The 2020 ACR-EULAR MPA Classification Criteria are now validated for use in clinical research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number221796
Pages (from-to)321-326
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Issue number3
Early online date2 Feb 2022
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) study, of which the development of these classification criteria was a part, was funded by grants from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), the Vasculitis Foundation and the University of Pennsylvania Vasculitis Center.

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.


  • Vasculitis
  • microscopic polyangiitis
  • anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody
  • classification


Dive into the research topics of '2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Microscopic Polyangiitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this