Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

24-week, all-oral regimens for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in TB-PRACTECAL trial sites: an economic evaluation

Sedona Sweeney*, Yoko V. Laurence, Catherine Berry*, Maninder Pal Singh, Matthew Dodd, Katherine Fielding, Emil Kazounis, Ronelle Moodliar, Varvara Solodovnikova, Zinaida Tigay, Irina Liverko, Nargiza Parpieva, Ilhomjon Butabekov, Ruzilya Usmanova, Mohammed Rassool, Ilaria Motta, George Mokua Nyangweso, Pascal Jolivet, Tleubergen Abdrasuliev, Soe MoePei Sun Aw, Nazgul Samieva, Bern Thomas Nyang'wa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:
New 6-month rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) with or without moxifloxacin or clofazimine, could improve treatment efficacy, safety, and tolerability, and free up resources within the health system. Following a change to WHO rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment guidelines, countries are facing difficult decisions about when and how to incorporate new drug regimens into national guidelines. We aimed to assess the probability of BPaL-based regimens being cost-saving using data collected in the TB-PRACTECAL trial.

Methods:
This economic evaluation using a cost-utility analysis was embedded in five TB-PRACTECAL trial sites in Belarus, Uzbekistan, and South Africa. Between Nov 19, 2020, and Sept 27, 2022, we collected detailed primary unit cost data in six hospitals and four ambulatory health facilities and collected data on patient-incurred costs from 73 trial participants. The primary efficacy endpoint of the main trial, a composite of unfavourable outcomes (death, disease recurrence, treatment failure, early discontinuation of therapy, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up) and clinically important safety outcomes by 72 weeks of follow-up were incorporated into the analysis. Societal perspective cost data and effect outcome data were input into a Markov model to estimate the cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted by BPaL-based regimens compared with the standard of care over a 20-year time horizon. We conducted a range of univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test our findings.

Findings:
BPaL-based regimens averted a mean of 1·28 DALYs and saved a mean of US$14 868 (SD 291) per person from the provider perspective compared with standard-of-care regimens over 20 years. Patient-incurred costs were reduced by a mean of $172 (SD 0·84) in BPaL-based regimen groups compared with standard of care. The main cost drivers for both providers and patients were inpatient bed-days; the duration of the inpatient period varied across countries. Varying a range of model parameters affected the degree of cost savings but did not change the finding that BPaL-based regimens are cost-saving compared with standard of care.

Interpretation:
This trial-based evidence adds to consistent indications from modelling studies that BPaL-based regimens are cost-saving for both the patient and health system. Urgent implementation of BPaL-based regimens in countries with a high burden of tuberculosis could improve treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, reduce pill burden, and free up desperately needed resources within the health system.

Funding:
Médecins Sans Frontières.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e355-e363
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet Global Health
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '24-week, all-oral regimens for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in TB-PRACTECAL trial sites: an economic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this