A call for the inclusion of mixed methods research in the undergraduate psychology curriculum

Lynne D Roberts, Peter Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
273 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For mixed methods research in psychology to expand, a body of psychologists and psychology academics who have the knowledge and expertise to conduct and review mixed methods research is required. Reviews of mixed methods articles in psychology (e.g., Bartholomew & Lockard, 2012, 2018) have highlighted issues related to the lack of clarity of methods used in published mixed methods psychological research. These include the failures to identify the type of mixed method design, the mixed methods research question, the qualitative analysis methodology, and to explicitly state the process for integrating data. These findings highlight the lack of training for psychologists in both conducting and reviewing mixed methods research. Whilst the new American Psychological Association reporting standards for mixed methods research (Levitt et al., 2018) are helpful for authors and reviewers with some mixed methods expertise, they must be complemented by at least foundational training in mixed methods research to ensure the quality and rigour of mixed methods research published in psychology journals...
Original languageEnglish
Article number2709
Number of pages4
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Mixed methods research
  • Pedagogy
  • Research methods
  • Undergraduate psychology
  • Undergraduate students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A call for the inclusion of mixed methods research in the undergraduate psychology curriculum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this