A cautionary tale of risk management, practice-led research and relational aesthetics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

In this chapter I explore the relationships between creative practices and the institutional mechanisms in place that seek to regulate them. Although my focus is on practice-led research and not on the art that - through little gestures - is like an angelic programme, a set of tasks carried out beside or beneath the real economic system, so as to patiently re-stitch the relational fabric (Bourriaud, 2002: 36), a discussion around the processes by which seemingly marginal, always opportunistic creative practices within higher education are normalised presents opportunities to think through the future role of relational aesthetics within the academy. With relational art practices attracting the attentions of magpie academics and as more artists within the universities lay claim to the title 'researcher' I conduct what may seem an arcane exercise in producing a genealogy of British practice-led research that focuses on the performativity of policy and criteria. As such, and in the spirit of the textile metaphors running through relational aesthetics, this is perhaps an exercise in administrative detailing, a particular genealogical embroidery.
Translated title of the contributionA cautionary tale of risk management, practice-led research and relational aesthetics
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication[ordlekar]
EditorsK Lindstrom, A Stahl, C Villanueva
PublisherUniversity of Vaxjo, Sweden
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A cautionary tale of risk management, practice-led research and relational aesthetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this