Abstract
Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over-specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub-field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Public Administration Review |
| Early online date | 12 Feb 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s).
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Governance and Public Policy Research Centre
Keywords
- : British Public Administration
- Positive Public Administration
- History of Public Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver