A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration

Ian C. Elliott*, Liz Richardson, Catherine Durose, Sarah A Ayres, John Boswell, Paul Cairney, Matthew Flinders, Steve Martin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over-specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub-field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalPublic Administration Review
Early online date12 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPS Governance and Public Policy Research Centre

Keywords

  • : British Public Administration
  • Positive Public Administration
  • History of Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this