A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy

Yvonne Wren*, Sue Roulstone

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports on the development and evaluation of a software program aimed at assisting children with phonological impairment. An experimental approach was used whereby children's speech output was assessed pre- and post-therapy. Children were randomly assigned to a computer, a tabletop or a no therapy group. Those children receiving the computer therapy were exposed to an experimental software program that mirrored the tabletop activities using interactive computer games. The results showed no significant difference between any of the three groups with regard to change in speech output. These results may relate to the amount and frequency of therapy given and also to the heterogeneous nature of children included in the study. There was considerable variation in individual performance across all three groups and the data were therefore analysed to look for patterns that might predict performance. Stimulability and gender were identified as possible predictors. Female children and those who were able to produce a greater number of consonant speech sounds in isolation were more likely to make progress in their speech output. Future research might use a similar methodology to compare the therapy conditions but with a more homogenous group in terms of stimulability and using a greater intensity of intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-363
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

Keywords

  • Computer assisted therapy
  • Phonological disorder
  • Predicting improvement
  • Psycholinguistic approach
  • Speech impairment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this