A comparison between robust design and digital twin approaches for Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF) forming

Siyuan Chen*, Adam J Thompson, Tim Dodwell, Stephen R Hallett, Jonathan P Belnoue

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

There is growing interest in adopting digital twin systems within the field of composites manufacturing. However, given the current limitations in measuring variability and accurately simulating complex defects, it remains questionable as to whether the high costs of building a digital twin are justified. In this paper, a case study is conducted on simulation-driven optimisation of the forming of non-crimp fabric (NCF). A robust design strategy (a one-time optimisation that is robust to variabilities of the material and process) is compared with a digital twin approach (active control is conducted based on real-time optimisation, accounting for in-situ measurements of variabilities). An optimisation method based on a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate model, active learning, dimension reduction and gradient boosting is developed. This method enables the optimisation of complex forming processes with a very small dataset, built from large simulation models. Both strategies significantly reduce the wrinkling level and improve process robustness.
Original languageEnglish
Article number108864
Number of pages18
JournalComposites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Volume193
Early online date21 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).

Research Groups and Themes

  • CoSEM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between robust design and digital twin approaches for Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF) forming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this