A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation

WD Drury; DMJ Holliday; PH Mellor

doi:10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572

A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation

WD Drury
, DMJ Holliday
, PH Mellor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The performances of sensorless flux observer and back-EMF methods of rotor position estimation in a brushless permanent magnet generator are compared. A simulation model is developed to investigate the accuracy of each method in the presence of electrical distortion and noise. Experimental results show that, over a speed range of 50 -500 rpm, the flux observer is significantly more accurate than the back-EMF method.

Translated title of the contribution	A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation
Original language	English
Title of host publication	41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6-8 September
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Pages	714 - 718
Number of pages	5
ISBN (Print)	9781861353429
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572
Publication status	Published - Sept 2006

Access to Document

10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=4218779

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Drury, WD., Holliday, DMJ., & Mellor, PH. (2006). A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation. In 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6-8 September (pp. 714 - 718). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572

@inproceedings{389d293a8e73440780f842ca5e62353f,

title = "A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation",

abstract = "The performances of sensorless flux observer and back-EMF methods of rotor position estimation in a brushless permanent magnet generator are compared. A simulation model is developed to investigate the accuracy of each method in the presence of electrical distortion and noise. Experimental results show that, over a speed range of 50 -500 rpm, the flux observer is significantly more accurate than the back-EMF method.",

author = "WD Drury and DMJ Holliday and PH Mellor",

year = "2006",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781861353429",

pages = "714 -- 718",

booktitle = "41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6-8 September",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)",

address = "United States",

}

A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation. / Drury, WD; Holliday, DMJ; Mellor, PH.
41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6-8 September. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2006. p. 714 - 718.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation

AU - Drury, WD

AU - Holliday, DMJ

AU - Mellor, PH

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - The performances of sensorless flux observer and back-EMF methods of rotor position estimation in a brushless permanent magnet generator are compared. A simulation model is developed to investigate the accuracy of each method in the presence of electrical distortion and noise. Experimental results show that, over a speed range of 50 -500 rpm, the flux observer is significantly more accurate than the back-EMF method.

AB - The performances of sensorless flux observer and back-EMF methods of rotor position estimation in a brushless permanent magnet generator are compared. A simulation model is developed to investigate the accuracy of each method in the presence of electrical distortion and noise. Experimental results show that, over a speed range of 50 -500 rpm, the flux observer is significantly more accurate than the back-EMF method.

U2 - 10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572

DO - 10.1109/UPEC.2006.367572

M3 - Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

SN - 9781861353429

SP - 714

EP - 718

BT - 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6-8 September

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

ER -

A Comparison of a Flux Observer with a Back-Emf Technique for Sensorless Rotor Position Estimation

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this