Abstract
We examine the relative efficiency of four methods for finite field representation in the context of elliptic curve cryptography (ECC). We conclude that a set of fields called the Optimized Extension Fields (OEFs) give greater performance, even when used with affine coordinates, when compared against the type of fields recommended in the emerging ECC standards. Although this performance advantage is only marginal and hence there is probably no need to change the current standards to allow OEF fields in standards compliant implementations.
| Translated title of the contribution | A comparison of different finite fields for use in Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 91 - 100 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Computers and Mathematics with Applications |
| Volume | 42 (?) |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2001 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of different finite fields for use in Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver