A comparison of hybrid and DSS schemes for substructured system testing

David P. Stoten*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is threefold: (i) To remove any misconceptions concerning the differences between hardware-in-the-loop simulation (HiLS), the hybrid scheme for substructured system testing and the dynamically substructured system (DSS) scheme for substructured system testing. (ii) To compare the hybrid and DSS substructure testing schemes in terms of their control system syntheses and corresponding relative stabilities. (iii) To provide a supporting comparative simulation study with application of the hybrid and DSS schemes to a relatively simple 'split-mass' substructured system. The key conclusion to emerge from the work is that DSS provides significant advantage in terms of relative stability over the hybrid scheme, especially when a pure delay term (representing computational delay) is included in the dynamic descriptions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMOVIC 2014 - 12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control
PublisherJapan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Event12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, MOVIC 2014 - Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Duration: 3 Aug 20147 Aug 2014

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, MOVIC 2014
CountryJapan
CitySapporo, Hokkaido
Period3/08/147/08/14

Keywords

  • Dynamically substructured system testing
  • Hardware-in-the-Loop simulation
  • Hybrid system testing
  • Pseudo-dynamic system testing
  • Pure delay systems
  • Synchronisation control

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of hybrid and DSS schemes for substructured system testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this