Abstract
The objective of this paper is threefold: (i) To remove any misconceptions concerning the differences between hardware-in-the-loop simulation (HiLS), the hybrid scheme for substructured system testing and the dynamically substructured system (DSS) scheme for substructured system testing. (ii) To compare the hybrid and DSS substructure testing schemes in terms of their control system syntheses and corresponding relative stabilities. (iii) To provide a supporting comparative simulation study with application of the hybrid and DSS schemes to a relatively simple 'split-mass' substructured system. The key conclusion to emerge from the work is that DSS provides significant advantage in terms of relative stability over the hybrid scheme, especially when a pure delay term (representing computational delay) is included in the dynamic descriptions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | MOVIC 2014 - 12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control |
Publisher | Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Event | 12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, MOVIC 2014 - Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan Duration: 3 Aug 2014 → 7 Aug 2014 |
Conference
Conference | 12th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, MOVIC 2014 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Japan |
City | Sapporo, Hokkaido |
Period | 3/08/14 → 7/08/14 |
Keywords
- Dynamically substructured system testing
- Hardware-in-the-Loop simulation
- Hybrid system testing
- Pseudo-dynamic system testing
- Pure delay systems
- Synchronisation control
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of hybrid and DSS schemes for substructured system testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor David P Stoten
- Department of Mechanical Engineering - Emeritus Professor of Dynamics and Control
Person: Honorary and Visiting Academic