Abstract
Computational feasibility is a widespread concern that guides the framing and modeling of natural and artificial intelligence. The specification of cognitive system capacities is often shaped by unexamined intuitive assumptions about the search space and complexity of a subcomputation. However, a mistaken intuition might make such initial conceptualizations misleading for what empirical questions appear relevant later on. We undertake here computational-level modeling and complexity analyses of segmentation — a widely hypothesized subcomputation that plays a requisite role in explanations of capacities across domains, such as speech recognition, music cognition, active sensing, event memory, action parsing, and statistical learning — as a case study to show how crucial it is to formally assess these assumptions. We mathematically prove two sets of results regarding computational hardness and search space size that may run counter to intuition, and position their implications with respect to existing views on the subcapacity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 255-273 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Topics in Cognitive Science |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 1 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The Authors. Topics in Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society.
Keywords
- Computational complexity
- Computational-level analysis
- Modeling
- Segmentation
- Theory
- Tractability