Skip to content

A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model. / Wing, Oliver; Sampson, Chris; Bates, Paul; Quinn, Niall; Smith, Andrew; Neal, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 4, 17.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Wing, Oliver ; Sampson, Chris ; Bates, Paul ; Quinn, Niall ; Smith, Andrew ; Neal, Jeffrey. / A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2019 ; Vol. 4.

Bibtex

@article{7cb582358c7d4836be3d5715f3299dbd,
title = "A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model",
abstract = "Forecasts of tropical cyclones have seen rapid improvements in recent years as expanding computational capacity permits more runs of finer resolution meteorological models with increasing representation of physical processes. However, the utilization of a hydrodynamic component in these models is often neglected, meaning flood forecasts typically output point water levels that give little indication of a projected inundation extent on the ground. Here, we append this critical component to the forecast cascade by coupling Fathom-US, a continental-scale hydraulic model which employs the LISFLOOD-FP numerical scheme, to forecasts of streamflow, rainfall and coastal surge height from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Medium-term (2 – 15 days) flood inundation forecasts, as well as hindcasts driven by real-time observations, were executed for Hurricane Harvey by rapidly simulating pluvial and coastal flood hazard and extracting fluvial flood maps from an existing US-wide simulation library. The resultant ~30 m resolution depth grids were then validated against post-event observations collated by the US Geological Survey. Across the disaster zone, the hindcast (forecast) model captured, on average, 78{\%} (75{\%}) of the benchmark flood extent, obtained a Critical Success Index of 0.66 (0.57) and deviated from observed high water marks by ~1 m (~1.2 m). When compared to a simpler GIS-based approach, the hydraulic model exhibited much higher skill in replicating observations. This study shows that fully hydrodynamic approaches can be practicably employed in large-scale forecast frameworks at high resolution to produce skillful projections of inundation extent without significantly affecting the forecast lead time.",
keywords = "flooding, hydrodynamic modeling, flood forecasting, Hurricane Harvey, large-scale modeling, validation",
author = "Oliver Wing and Chris Sampson and Paul Bates and Niall Quinn and Andrew Smith and Jeffrey Neal",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100039",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model

AU - Wing, Oliver

AU - Sampson, Chris

AU - Bates, Paul

AU - Quinn, Niall

AU - Smith, Andrew

AU - Neal, Jeffrey

PY - 2019/8/17

Y1 - 2019/8/17

N2 - Forecasts of tropical cyclones have seen rapid improvements in recent years as expanding computational capacity permits more runs of finer resolution meteorological models with increasing representation of physical processes. However, the utilization of a hydrodynamic component in these models is often neglected, meaning flood forecasts typically output point water levels that give little indication of a projected inundation extent on the ground. Here, we append this critical component to the forecast cascade by coupling Fathom-US, a continental-scale hydraulic model which employs the LISFLOOD-FP numerical scheme, to forecasts of streamflow, rainfall and coastal surge height from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Medium-term (2 – 15 days) flood inundation forecasts, as well as hindcasts driven by real-time observations, were executed for Hurricane Harvey by rapidly simulating pluvial and coastal flood hazard and extracting fluvial flood maps from an existing US-wide simulation library. The resultant ~30 m resolution depth grids were then validated against post-event observations collated by the US Geological Survey. Across the disaster zone, the hindcast (forecast) model captured, on average, 78% (75%) of the benchmark flood extent, obtained a Critical Success Index of 0.66 (0.57) and deviated from observed high water marks by ~1 m (~1.2 m). When compared to a simpler GIS-based approach, the hydraulic model exhibited much higher skill in replicating observations. This study shows that fully hydrodynamic approaches can be practicably employed in large-scale forecast frameworks at high resolution to produce skillful projections of inundation extent without significantly affecting the forecast lead time.

AB - Forecasts of tropical cyclones have seen rapid improvements in recent years as expanding computational capacity permits more runs of finer resolution meteorological models with increasing representation of physical processes. However, the utilization of a hydrodynamic component in these models is often neglected, meaning flood forecasts typically output point water levels that give little indication of a projected inundation extent on the ground. Here, we append this critical component to the forecast cascade by coupling Fathom-US, a continental-scale hydraulic model which employs the LISFLOOD-FP numerical scheme, to forecasts of streamflow, rainfall and coastal surge height from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Medium-term (2 – 15 days) flood inundation forecasts, as well as hindcasts driven by real-time observations, were executed for Hurricane Harvey by rapidly simulating pluvial and coastal flood hazard and extracting fluvial flood maps from an existing US-wide simulation library. The resultant ~30 m resolution depth grids were then validated against post-event observations collated by the US Geological Survey. Across the disaster zone, the hindcast (forecast) model captured, on average, 78% (75%) of the benchmark flood extent, obtained a Critical Success Index of 0.66 (0.57) and deviated from observed high water marks by ~1 m (~1.2 m). When compared to a simpler GIS-based approach, the hydraulic model exhibited much higher skill in replicating observations. This study shows that fully hydrodynamic approaches can be practicably employed in large-scale forecast frameworks at high resolution to produce skillful projections of inundation extent without significantly affecting the forecast lead time.

KW - flooding

KW - hydrodynamic modeling

KW - flood forecasting

KW - Hurricane Harvey

KW - large-scale modeling

KW - validation

U2 - 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100039

DO - 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100039

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -