TY - BOOK
T1 - A Future for the Profession
T2 - The Experience and Impact of Government Social Researchers
AU - Molina, Julian
AU - Connolly, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The authors.
PY - 2026/1/5
Y1 - 2026/1/5
N2 - Government Social Research (GSR) is a 2,650-strong profession working across more than thirty UK departments and public bodies. This report examines how GSR is experienced, governed and valued, and what a sustainable future for the profession might require. Drawing on 43 semi-structured interviews with current and former members, Freedom of Information data and documentary analysis, it depicts a profession at the research–policy nexus: commissioning and managing projects, generating new data, designing evaluations, and convening teams under tight timelines. Findings highlight status and authority gaps relative to economics and statistics, constrained progression (a “thick band” at SEO/G7), and a gendered authority gap. Governance is experienced as fragile and reliant on informal networks, while risk aversion and clearance delays restrict publication and public learning. The report proposes three priorities: engaged interprofessional working, enabled systems leadership, and embedded learning cultures that strengthen research literacy, support methodological innovation (including ethical AI use), and make prompt publication non-negotiable.
AB - Government Social Research (GSR) is a 2,650-strong profession working across more than thirty UK departments and public bodies. This report examines how GSR is experienced, governed and valued, and what a sustainable future for the profession might require. Drawing on 43 semi-structured interviews with current and former members, Freedom of Information data and documentary analysis, it depicts a profession at the research–policy nexus: commissioning and managing projects, generating new data, designing evaluations, and convening teams under tight timelines. Findings highlight status and authority gaps relative to economics and statistics, constrained progression (a “thick band” at SEO/G7), and a gendered authority gap. Governance is experienced as fragile and reliant on informal networks, while risk aversion and clearance delays restrict publication and public learning. The report proposes three priorities: engaged interprofessional working, enabled systems leadership, and embedded learning cultures that strengthen research literacy, support methodological innovation (including ethical AI use), and make prompt publication non-negotiable.
KW - Social Research
KW - Government Social Research
KW - Social Sciences
KW - Evidence-based policy
U2 - 10.59019/QODW8846
DO - 10.59019/QODW8846
M3 - Other report
BT - A Future for the Profession
PB - University of Bristol
ER -