A Geometric Comparison of Aerofoil Shape Parameterisation Methods

D. A. Masters, N. J. Taylor, T. C S Rendall, C. B. Allen, D. J. Poole

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

14 Citations (Scopus)
269 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A comprehensive review of aerofoil shape parameterisation methods that can be used for aerodynamic shape optimisation is presented. Seven parameterisation methods are considered for a range of design variables: class function/shape function transformations (CST); B-Splines; Hicks-Henne bump functions; a domain element approach using Radial Basis functions (RBF); B`ezier surfaces; a singular value decomposition modal extraction method (SVD); and the PARSEC method. Due to the large range of variables involved the most effective way to implement each method is first investigated. Their performance is then analysed by considering the geometric shape recovery of over 2000 aerofoils using a range of design variables, testing the efficiency of design space coverage with respect to a given tolerance. It is shown that, for all the methods, between 20 and 25 design variables are needed to cover the full design space to within a geometric tolerance with the SVD method doing this most efficiently. A more detailed study is presented for three aerofoils, RAE2822, ONERA M6 (D section) and NACA4412 with geometric error and convergence of the resulting aerodynamic properties explored. The case study results give insight into the rate at which the aerodynamic properties converge relative to the geometric design variables and suggests that the geometric tolerance may not always be a sufficient condition to guarantee convergence of these properties.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9781624103933
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2016
Event54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016 - San Diego, United States
Duration: 4 Jan 20168 Jan 2016

Conference

Conference54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period4/01/168/01/16

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Geometric Comparison of Aerofoil Shape Parameterisation Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this