A new barrier to the existence of moving kinks in Frenkel Kontorova lattices

AA Aigner, AR Champneys, VM Rothos

Research output: Working paper

257 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An explanation is offered for an observed lower bound on the wave speed of travelling kinks in Frenkel Kontorova lattices. Kinks exist at discrete wavespeeds within a parameter regime where there is a resonance with linear waves (phonons). However, they fail to exist even in this codimension-one sense whenever there is more than one phonon branch in the dispersion relation; inside such bands only quasikinks with non-decaying oscillatory tails are possible. The results are presented for a discrete sine-Gordon lattice with an onsite potential that has a tunable amount of anharmonicity. Novel numerical methods are used to trace kinks with topological charge Q = 1 and 2 in three parameters representing the propagation speed, lattice discreteness and anharmonicity. Although none of the analysis is presented as rigorous mathematics, numerical results suggest that the bound on allowable wavespeeds is sharp. The results also explain why the vanishing, at discrete values of anharmonicity, of the Peierls-Nabarro barrier between stationary kinks as discovered by Savin et al, does not lead to bifurcation of kinks with small wave speed
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusUnpublished - 2003

Bibliographical note

Additional information: Later published by Elsevier Science, (2003) Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 186 (3-4), pp. 148-170. ISSN 0167-2789

Sponsorship: EPSRC grant GR/R02719/01. The work of ARC was partially supported by an EPSRC Advanced Fellowship

Research Groups and Themes

  • Engineering Mathematics Research Group

Keywords

  • discrete sine-Gordon equation
  • dispersion relations
  • kinks
  • anharmonicity
  • nonlinear lattices
  • topological solitons
  • numerical continuation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A new barrier to the existence of moving kinks in Frenkel Kontorova lattices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this