A Prophet is Rejected in His Home Town (Mark 6.4 and parallels): A Study in the Methodological (In)Consistency of the Jesus Seminar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While some might construct their view of the historical Jesus based upon the published findings of the Jesus Seminar, others may re-examine individual pericopae and argue that a change of ‘colour’ would be appropriate. Here it is suggested that the arguments off ered by the Seminar to justify the colouring of one saying of Jesus—that a prophet is rejected in his home town (Gos. Thom. 31.1, Mk 6.4, Matt. 13.57, Lk. 4.24, and Jn 4.44)—as a (deep) pink are flawed. Arguments based upon multiple attestation, plausibility and embarrassment are considered and rejected, leading to the conclusion that black is the most appropriate colour for the saying. Two explanations for its inclusion in the Gospels are offered: that it is a proverb inserted by the writers because it mirrored their own circumstances, and the more speculative view that the saying was viewed as appropriate because of Jesus’ own hyperbolic characterization of discipleship (cf. Lk. 14.26).
Translated title of the contributionA Prophet is Rejected in His Home Town (Mark 6.4 and parallels): A Study in the Methodological (In)Consistency of the Jesus Seminar
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-84
Number of pages26
JournalJournal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Bibliographical note

Publisher: E. J. Brill

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Prophet is Rejected in His Home Town (Mark 6.4 and parallels): A Study in the Methodological (In)Consistency of the Jesus Seminar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this