Projects per year
Abstract
Background
Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool.
Methods
This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines.
Results
We do not recommend a single “best” approach. Instead we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around 3 key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination.
Conclusions
We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods.
Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool.
Methods
This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines.
Results
We do not recommend a single “best” approach. Instead we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around 3 key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination.
Conclusions
We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 204 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Systematic Reviews |
| Volume | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Oct 2017 |
Keywords
- Risk of Bias
- Systematic Reviews
- Quality
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Projects
- 5 Finished
-
ACROBAT-RT: Refinment of and extensions to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for Randomised trials
1/05/15 → 31/10/16
Project: Research
-
-
Profiles
-
Dr Penny F Whiting
- Bristol Medical School (PHS) - Associate Professor in Clinical Epidemiology
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute
Person: Academic , Member