A Review of Zirconolite Solid Solution Regimes for Plutonium and Candidate Neutron Absorbing Additives

Lewis R. Blackburn*, Claire L. Corkhill, Neil C. Hyatt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Should the decision be made to immobilise the UK Pu inventory through a campaign of Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) in a zirconolite matrix, prior to placement in a geological disposal facility (GDF), a suite of disposability criteria must be satisfied. A GDF safety case should be able to demonstrate that post-closure criticality is not a significant concern by demonstrating that such an event would have a low likelihood of occurring and low consequence if it were to occur. In the case of ceramic wasteforms, an effective means of criticality control may be the co-incorporation of a requisite quantity of a suitable neutron absorbing additive, either through co-immobilisation within the host structure or the encapsulation of discrete particles within the grain structure. Following an initial screening of a range of potential neutron absorbing additives, a literature-based assessment of the solid solution limits of a number of potential additives (Gd, Hf, Sm, In, Cd, B) in the candidate zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7) wasteform is presented. Key areas of research that are in need of development to further support the safety case for nuclearised HIP for Pu inventories are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1330-1347
Number of pages18
JournalCeramics
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.

Keywords

  • criticality
  • hot isostatic pressing
  • immobilisation
  • plutonium
  • wasteform
  • zirconolite

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Review of Zirconolite Solid Solution Regimes for Plutonium and Candidate Neutron Absorbing Additives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this