A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech-sound disorder in preschool children

Yvonne Wren*, Sam Harding, Juliet Goldbart, Sue Roulstone

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
514 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple nterventions have been developed to address speech sound disorder (SSD) in children. Many of these have been evaluated but the evidence for these has not been considered within a model which categorizes types of intervention. The opportunity to carry out a systematic of interventions for SSD arose as part of a larger scale study of interventions for primary speech and language impairment in preschool children.

AIMS: To review systematically the evidence for interventions for SSD in preschool children and to categorize them within a classification of interventions for SSD.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Relevant search terms were used to identify intervention studies published up to 2012, with the following inclusion criteria: participants were aged between 2 years and 5 years, 11 months; they exhibited speech, language and communication needs; and a primary outcome measure of speech was used. Studies that met inclusion criteria were quality appraised using the single case experimental design (SCED) or PEDro-P, depending on their methodology. Those judged to be high quality were classified according to the primary focus of intervention.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The final review included 26 studies. Case series was the most common research design. Categorization to the classification system for interventions showed that cognitive-linguistic and production approaches to intervention were the most frequently reported. The highest graded evidence was for three studies within the auditory-perceptual and integrated categories.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The evidence for intervention for preschool children with SSD is focused on seven out of 11 subcategories of interventions. Although all the studies included in the review were good quality as defined by quality appraisal checklists, they mostly represented lower-graded evidence. Higher-graded studies are needed to understand clearly the strength of evidence for different interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-467
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Volume53
Issue number3
Early online date16 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • Child Talk
  • Intervention
  • Speech-sound disorder
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech-sound disorder in preschool children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this