Skip to content

A systematic review protocol examining workplace interventions that aim to improve employee health and wellbeing in male-dominated industries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number10 (2020)
Pages (from-to)10
Number of pages7
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 18 Dec 2019
DatePublished (current) - 9 Jan 2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The workplace environment potentially provides access to a large population who are employed, and it is an employer's responsibility to provide appropriate conditions for its employees. Whilst the aetiology of cardiovascular disease is multifactorial, it is generally acknowledged that working conditions, gender and age are involved in its development. Male-dominated industries (comprising > 70% male workers, e.g., agriculture, construction, manufacturing, mining, transport and technology) have a higher prevalence of health risk behaviours than other population subgroups. Working in a gender-dominated industry can impact an employee's health and wellbeing, particularly for the opposite sex. This systematic review examines workplace interventions that address the health and wellbeing of employees in male-dominated industries.

METHODS: We will include randomised controlled trials and studies with non-randomised intervention groups. The interventions must aim to improve employee physical and/or mental health and wellbeing implemented in the workplace in male-dominated industries. There will be no limits on date. The following electronic databases will be searched for published studies: Web of Science, Embed, MedLine, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Database. The search strategy will include free-text terms and MeSH vocabulary, including 'male-dominated industries', 'workplace interventions', 'occupational stress', 'mental health', 'cardiovascular disease', 'blood pressure', 'body mass index' and 'exercise'. Two authors will independently select, review and extract data from studies that meet the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias. We will perform structured summaries of the included studies and, if possible, conduct meta-analyses or construct an Albatross plot.

DISCUSSION: There are an increasing number of interventions designed to improve employee health and wellbeing in the workplace, but no prior review that systematically evaluates their effectiveness. A systematic review is required to prioritise the future implementation of those interventions found to be most effective.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019161283.

    Structured keywords

  • ICEP

    Research areas

  • male-dominated industries, workplace interventions, employee health and wellbeing, occupational stress, systematic Review

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BMC at https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-019-1260-9 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 561 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

  • document(36)

    Final published version, 561 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups