'A warning against quack doctors': The Old Bailey trial of Indian oculists, 1893

Sumita Mukherjee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The cataract operation is said to have been perfected by Susruta, the 'Hippocrates of India', some time around the sixth century B.C.E. However, at the end of the nineteenth century in Britain, India's reputation for expertise in ocular surgery was under threat and at the point of being discredited. At this time, a number of Indian oculists were working in Britain, outside the professional medical sector using itinerant methods and forms of advertising that were associated with 'quacks'. The activities of four Indian eye-doctors came to the fore with a trial at the Old Bailey in 1893 for 'fraud'. This article locates such Indian oculists within a tradition of 'fringe medicine' in Britain, and discusses, in particular, their methods of advertising and the proceedings of the aforementioned trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-91
Number of pages16
JournalHistorical Research
Volume86
Issue number231
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''A warning against quack doctors': The Old Bailey trial of Indian oculists, 1893'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this