Abstract
According to the neo-Fregean abstractionism, numerical expressions of the form ‘the number of Fs’, introduced by Hume’s Principle, should be read as purportedly referential singular terms. I will explore the prospects of a version of abstractionism in which such expressions have presuppositional content, as in Strawson’s account. I will argue that the thesis that ‘the number of Fs’ semantically presupposes the existence of a number is inconsistent with the required ‘modest’ stipulative character of the truth of Hume’s Principle: since Hume’s Principle is true and provably presupposes that numbers exist, what it presupposes is also true; and so numbers exist. This, however, means that numbers are conjured into existence by a direct stipulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-428 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Analysis |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Trust. All rights reserved.