Abuse of process: R. v Jones (Sally Ann)

Jennifer Collins

Abuse of process: R. v Jones (Sally Ann)

Jennifer Collins

University of Bristol Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal)

222 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Comments on R. v Jones (Sally Ann) (CA) on whether a private prosecution following an assurance of immunity from prosecution constituted an abuse of process, or whether the assurance related only to civil proceedings, and the admissibility of evidence obtained pursuant to a Norwich Pharmacal order.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1071-1075
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Criminal Law Review
Volume	12
Publication status	Published - 12 Nov 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

Abuse of process
Norwich Pharmacal order
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Access to Document

Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)
This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sweet & Maxwell at https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Product/Criminal-Law/Criminal-Law-Review/Journal/30791441. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Accepted author manuscript, 147 KB

https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Product/Criminal-Law/Criminal-Law-Review/Journal/30791441

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

Full-text PDF (Proof)
Proof, 345 KB
Request copy

Cite this

@article{13846e1ace1847468fb68d33bbc8f49f,

title = "Abuse of process: R. v Jones (Sally Ann)",

abstract = "Comments on R. v Jones (Sally Ann) (CA) on whether a private prosecution following an assurance of immunity from prosecution constituted an abuse of process, or whether the assurance related only to civil proceedings, and the admissibility of evidence obtained pursuant to a Norwich Pharmacal order.",

keywords = "Abuse of process, Norwich Pharmacal order, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)",

author = "Jennifer Collins",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

day = "12",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "1071--1075",

journal = "The Criminal Law Review",

issn = "0011-135X",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell-Thomson Reuters",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abuse of process: R. v Jones (Sally Ann)

AU - Collins, Jennifer

PY - 2021/11/12

Y1 - 2021/11/12

N2 - Comments on R. v Jones (Sally Ann) (CA) on whether a private prosecution following an assurance of immunity from prosecution constituted an abuse of process, or whether the assurance related only to civil proceedings, and the admissibility of evidence obtained pursuant to a Norwich Pharmacal order.

AB - Comments on R. v Jones (Sally Ann) (CA) on whether a private prosecution following an assurance of immunity from prosecution constituted an abuse of process, or whether the assurance related only to civil proceedings, and the admissibility of evidence obtained pursuant to a Norwich Pharmacal order.

KW - Abuse of process

KW - Norwich Pharmacal order

KW - Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

SN - 0011-135X

VL - 12

SP - 1071

EP - 1075

JO - The Criminal Law Review

JF - The Criminal Law Review

ER -

Abuse of process: R. v Jones (Sally Ann)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this