Action Planning and the Timescale of Evidence Accumulation

Konstantinos Tsetsos, Thomas Pfeffer, Pia Jentgens, Tobias H Donner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are based on the temporal integration of sensory evidence for different states of the outside world. The timescale of this integration process varies widely across behavioral contexts and individuals, and it is diagnostic for the underlying neural mechanisms. In many situations, the decision-maker knows the required mapping between perceptual evidence and motor response (henceforth termed "sensory-motor contingency") before decision formation. Here, the integrated evidence can be directly translated into a motor plan and, indeed, neural signatures of the integration process are evident as build-up activity in premotor brain regions. In other situations, however, the sensory-motor contingencies are unknown at the time of decision formation. We used behavioral psychophysics and computational modeling to test if knowledge about sensory-motor contingencies affects the timescale of perceptual evidence integration. We asked human observers to perform the same motion discrimination task, with or without trial-to-trial variations of the mapping between perceptual choice and motor response. When the mapping varied, it was either instructed before or after the stimulus presentation. We quantified the timescale of evidence integration under these different sensory-motor mapping conditions by means of two approaches. First, we analyzed subjects' discrimination threshold as a function of stimulus duration. Second, we fitted a dynamical decision-making model to subjects' choice behavior. The results from both approaches indicated that observers (i) integrated motion information for several hundred ms, (ii) used a shorter than optimal integration timescale, and (iii) used the same integration timescale under all sensory-motor mappings. We conclude that the mechanisms limiting the timescale of perceptual decisions are largely independent from long-term learning (under fixed mapping) or rapid acquisition (under variable mapping) of sensory-motor contingencies. This conclusion has implications for neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies of perceptual decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0129473
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Brain/physiology
  • Brain Mapping
  • Decision Making
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychomotor Performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Action Planning and the Timescale of Evidence Accumulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this