Activity: Critically Evaluating AI Outputs using the CRAAP Framework

Alison M Oldfield; Maxime M Perrott; Rosey Crow; Christy C Fisher; Kerrianne B Orriss; Tim A Worth

Activity: Critically Evaluating AI Outputs using the CRAAP Framework

Alison M Oldfield^*, Maxime M Perrott, Rosey Crow, Christy C Fisher, Kerrianne B Orriss, Tim A Worth

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Other contribution

228 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims of the activity:

• Develop critical thinking skills by analysing AI responses using the CRAAP framework
• Evaluate references for credibility, authority and relevance and lateral reading to fact check
• Identify potential biases and misinformation in AI-generated content
• Encourage participants to reflect on the opportunities and challenges of using AI at university in the context of academic integrity
• Discuss the ethical implications of using AI tools in academic settings

Original language	English
Type	Teaching Activity
Number of pages	11
Publication status	Published - Sept 2025

Keywords

teaching
artificial intelligence
higher education
Co-produced research
critical literacy
critical AI literacy

Access to Document

critically evaluating AI outputs mergedFinal published version, 1.06 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-SA

Handle.net

Persistent link

Survey report: University of Bristol student use, views, concerns and support needs about AI in their studies
Oldfield, A. M., Perrott, M. M., Crow, R., Fisher, C. C., Orriss, K. B. & Worth, T. A., Sept 2025, 26 p.
Research output: Other contribution

Open Access
File

A Reflective Approach to AI: Co-creating resources to support HE students’ critical use of AI
Oldfield, A. M. (Principal Investigator), Perrott, M. M. (Co-Investigator), Crow, R. (Co-Investigator), Fisher, C. C. (Co-Investigator), Orriss, K. B. (Co-Investigator) & Worth, T. A. (Co-Investigator)
2/09/24 → 31/07/25
Project: Research

Cite this

@misc{92ea2c8cfe4c41299a49a992c3f11109,

title = "Activity: Critically Evaluating AI Outputs using the CRAAP Framework",

abstract = "Aims of the activity: • Develop critical thinking skills by analysing AI responses using the CRAAP framework • Evaluate references for credibility, authority and relevance and lateral reading to fact check • Identify potential biases and misinformation in AI-generated content • Encourage participants to reflect on the opportunities and challenges of using AI at university in the context of academic integrity • Discuss the ethical implications of using AI tools in academic settings ",

keywords = "teaching, artificial intelligence, higher education, Co-produced research, critical literacy, critical AI literacy",

author = "Oldfield, \{Alison M\} and Perrott, \{Maxime M\} and Rosey Crow and Fisher, \{Christy C\} and Orriss, \{Kerrianne B\} and Worth, \{Tim A\}",

year = "2025",

month = sep,

language = "English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Activity

T2 - Critically Evaluating AI Outputs using the CRAAP Framework

AU - Oldfield, Alison M

AU - Perrott, Maxime M

AU - Crow, Rosey

AU - Fisher, Christy C

AU - Orriss, Kerrianne B

AU - Worth, Tim A

PY - 2025/9

Y1 - 2025/9

N2 - Aims of the activity: • Develop critical thinking skills by analysing AI responses using the CRAAP framework • Evaluate references for credibility, authority and relevance and lateral reading to fact check • Identify potential biases and misinformation in AI-generated content • Encourage participants to reflect on the opportunities and challenges of using AI at university in the context of academic integrity • Discuss the ethical implications of using AI tools in academic settings

AB - Aims of the activity: • Develop critical thinking skills by analysing AI responses using the CRAAP framework • Evaluate references for credibility, authority and relevance and lateral reading to fact check • Identify potential biases and misinformation in AI-generated content • Encourage participants to reflect on the opportunities and challenges of using AI at university in the context of academic integrity • Discuss the ethical implications of using AI tools in academic settings

KW - teaching

KW - artificial intelligence

KW - higher education

KW - Co-produced research

KW - critical literacy

KW - critical AI literacy

M3 - Other contribution

ER -

Activity: Critically Evaluating AI Outputs using the CRAAP Framework

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Research output

Survey report: University of Bristol student use, views, concerns and support needs about AI in their studies

Projects

A Reflective Approach to AI: Co-creating resources to support HE students’ critical use of AI

Cite this