TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information
AU - Gambhir, Ajay
AU - Mittal, Shivika
AU - Lamboll, Robin D.
AU - Grant, Neil
AU - Bernie, Dan
AU - Gohar, Laila
AU - Hawkes, Adam
AU - Köberle, Alexandre
AU - Rogelj, Joeri
AU - Lowe, Jason A.
PY - 2023/8/23
Y1 - 2023/8/23
N2 - Understanding how 1.5 °C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5 °C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment, is critical for planning resilient pathways. We use an integrated assessment model to explore potential pathway adjustments starting in 2025 and 2030, following the arrival of new information. The 1.5 °C target remains achievable in the model, in light of some adverse information, provided a broad portfolio of technologies and measures is still available. If multiple pieces of adverse information arrive simultaneously, average annual emissions reductions near 3 GtCO2/yr for the first five years following the pathway adjustment, compared to 2 GtCO2/yr in 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic began. Moreover, in these scenarios of multiple simultaneous adverse information, by 2050 mitigation costs are 4-5 times as high as a no adverse information scenario, highlighting the criticality of developing a wide range of mitigation options, including energy demand reduction options.
AB - Understanding how 1.5 °C pathways could adjust in light of new adverse information, such as a reduced 1.5 °C carbon budget, or slower-than-expected low-carbon technology deployment, is critical for planning resilient pathways. We use an integrated assessment model to explore potential pathway adjustments starting in 2025 and 2030, following the arrival of new information. The 1.5 °C target remains achievable in the model, in light of some adverse information, provided a broad portfolio of technologies and measures is still available. If multiple pieces of adverse information arrive simultaneously, average annual emissions reductions near 3 GtCO2/yr for the first five years following the pathway adjustment, compared to 2 GtCO2/yr in 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic began. Moreover, in these scenarios of multiple simultaneous adverse information, by 2050 mitigation costs are 4-5 times as high as a no adverse information scenario, highlighting the criticality of developing a wide range of mitigation options, including energy demand reduction options.
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
DO - 10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 37612287
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 14
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
M1 - 5117
ER -