Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advocacy and the Search for Truth in Management Scholarship: Can the Twain Ever Meet?

  • Thomas A. Wright*
  • , Kyle Emich
  • , Jone L. Pearce
  • , Stratos Ramoglou
  • , Neal M. Ashkanasy
  • , Jean M. Bartunek
  • , Sven Kunisch
  • , David Denyer
  • , Nicolai J. Foss
  • , Peter G. Klein
  • , Sophia Town
  • , John Hollwitz
  • , Chet Barney
  • , Peter Harms
  • , Timothy P. Munyon
  • , Gerard Seijts
  • , Eric Tsang
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Scholars have long debated the merits of advocacy-based research versus research considered from the quest for objective truth. Building upon reflections from multiple sources, a set of 11 brief reflections on three posed questions are presented. Tsang concludes our discussion with additional insights on how moving beyond the “interestingness” advocacy will be beneficial to the continued professional development of the management discipline.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11-25
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    Early online date3 Oct 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Advocacy and the Search for Truth in Management Scholarship: Can the Twain Ever Meet?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this