Against the Grain? Member State Interests and EU Procurement Law

Albert Sanchez-Graells*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

4 Citations (Scopus)
190 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

EU public procurement law has been increasingly criticised for the restrictions it places on Member States’ regulatory autonomy and for the imposition of neoliberal conceptions of State intervention in the economy that do not necessarily match the general preferences of Member States with a social market economy orientation. Following that view, it could be thought that there is a limited (and possibly narrowing) space for Member State interests in EU public procurement law—or, in other words, that pursuing national interests goes against the grain of the internal market foundations of the 2014 Public Procurement Package.

The purpose of this chapter is to dispel this conception by making three points. First, that despite its competition-orientedness, the 2014 Public Procurement Package does not impose a ‘one-size-fits-all’ straitjacket on domestic economic systems, but is rather compatible with diversity of economic models at national level. A series of complex trade-offs resulting from the last revision of the EU public procurement rules, where Member State interests played a multifaceted role, have consolidated a competition-based model with significant flexibility for non-market and non-competed mechanisms, as repeatedly tested before and confirmed by the Court of Justice. Second, that EU public procurement law, however, does appropriately prevent Member States from pursuing protectionist policies, even if they consider them to be in their national interest—quod non, because the proper working of the internal market is both in the collective interest of the EU and of the individual Member States. Third, that EU public procurement law, in particular in its current incarnation in the 2014 Public Procurement Package, emphasises the ability of Member States to pursue secondary policies (such as the promotion of innovation or sustainability) in a diverse manner, in accordance with their domestic interests and local particularism. On the whole, thus, EU public procurement law allows Member States significant space to pursue their national interests, always provided that they are also compatible with their own interest in the proper functioning of the internal market.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBetween Compliance and Particularism
Subtitle of host publicationMember State Interests and European Union Law
EditorsMarton Varju
PublisherSpringer, Cham
Pages171-181
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9783030057824
ISBN (Print)9783030057824, 9783030057817
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Public procurement
  • national interest
  • regulatory space
  • internal market
  • regulatory reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Against the Grain? Member State Interests and EU Procurement Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this