Against the Vagueness Argument

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


In this paper I offer a counterexample to the so called vagueness argument against restricted composition. This will be done in the lines of a recent suggestion by Trenton Merricks, namely by challenging the claim that there cannot be a sharp cut-off point in a composition sequence. It will be suggested that causal powers which emerge when composition occurs can serve as an indicator of such sharp cut-off points. The main example will be the case of a heap. It seems that heaps might provide a very plausible counterexample to the vagueness argument if we accept the idea that four grains of sand is the least number required to compose a heap—the case has been supported by W. D. Hart. My purpose here is not to put forward a new theory of composition, I only wish to refute the vagueness argument and point out that we should be wary of arguments of its form.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-340
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2009


  • Metaphysics
  • Vagueness
  • Restricted composition
  • Existence
  • Vagueness argument


Dive into the research topics of 'Against the Vagueness Argument'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this