Against Vote Markets: A Reply to Freiman

Alfred T M Archer, Alan T Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)peer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)


According to a recent paper by Christopher Freiman (forthcoming), the prohibition on the buying and selling of votes ought to be lifted. We will argue that Freiman’s defense of that position is unsuccessful. Freiman presents defeasible reasons in favor of the legalization of vote markets (2-8). He then considers two arguments – the Equality Argument and the Republican Argument– which, if either were correct, would undermine those defeasible reasons.

By rejecting these arguments, Freiman takes himself to have shown that the reasons in favor of vote markets remain undefeated, and so the case for vote markets is stronger than has been assumed. We will focus on Freiman’s respons
e to the Equality Argument, showing that this response is flawed and that, therefore, Freiman’s defense of vote markets is not successful.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Against Vote Markets: A Reply to Freiman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this