Abstract
Policy-relevant scientific models are typically expected to make empirically valid predictions about policy-relevant problems. What are the consequences of shaping our science-policy interface in this way? Here, it is argued that the theoretically insecure simulation modelling pioneered within artificial life is emblematic of an important alternative approach with significance for policy-relevant modelling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Artificial Life XV |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of The Fifteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems |
| Editors | Tom Froese |
| Publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press |
| Pages | 28-29 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780262339360 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alife as a Model Discipline for Policy-Relevant Simulation Modelling: Might "Worse" Simulations Fuel a Better Science-Policy Interface? (Extended Abstract)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver