Abstract
Negotiations often occur not between individuals but among groups (companies, trade unions, political parties, etc.) each representing composite interests, whose bargaining behaviour is regulated by some collective decision mechanism. In this paper we provide a natural model of such circumstances. We formalise the notion of 'alliance' and show how different preference aggregation procedures within the alliance affect the bargaining outcome. In particular, we find that unanimity procedures lead to 'more aggressive' negotiating tactics than majority procedures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 128-141 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Theory |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2005 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2005 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Alliances
- Multiperson bargaining
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alliances and negotiations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver