Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-

M. Artuso; S. Blusk; R. Mountain; T. Skwarnicki; S. Stone; L. M. Zhang; T. Gershon; G. Bonvicini; D. Cinabro; A. Lincoln; M. J. Smith; P. Zhou; J. Zhu; P. Naik; J. Rademacker; D. M. Asner; K. W. Edwards; K. Randrianarivony; G. Tatishvili; R. A. Briere; H. Vogel; P. U. E. Onyisi; J. L. Rosner; J. P. Alexander; D. G. Cassel; S. Das; R. Ehrlich; L. Gibbons; S. W. Gray; D. L. Hartill; B. K. Heltsley; D. L. Kreinick; V. E. Kuznetsov; J. R. Patterson; D. Peterson; D. Riley; A. Ryd; A. J. Sadoff; X. Shi; W. M. Sun; J. Yelton; P. Rubin; N. Lowrey; S. Mehrabyan; M. Selen; J. Wiss; J. Libby; M. Kornicer; R. E. Mitchell; D. Besson; T. K. Pedlar; D. Cronin-Hennessy; J. Hietala; S. Dobbs; Z. Metreveli; K. K. Seth; A. Tomaradze; T. Xiao; L. Martin; A. Powell; P. Spradlin; G. Wilkinson; J. Y. Ge; D. H. Miller; I. P. J. Shipsey; B. Xin; G. S. Adams; J. Napolitano; K. M. Ecklund; J. Insler; H. Muramatsu; C. S. Park; L. J. Pearson; E. H. Thorndike; S. Ricciardi; C. Thomas

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-

M. Artuso, S. Blusk, R. Mountain, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, L. M. Zhang, T. Gershon, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, A. Lincoln, M. J. Smith, P. Zhou, J. Zhu, P. Naik, J. Rademacker, D. M. Asner, K. W. Edwards, K. Randrianarivony, G. Tatishvili, R. A. BriereH. Vogel, P. U. E. Onyisi, J. L. Rosner, J. P. Alexander, D. G. Cassel, S. Das, R. Ehrlich, L. Gibbons, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, D. L. Kreinick, V. E. Kuznetsov, J. R. Patterson, D. Peterson, D. Riley, A. Ryd, A. J. Sadoff, X. Shi, W. M. Sun, J. Yelton, P. Rubin, N. Lowrey, S. Mehrabyan, M. Selen, J. Wiss, J. Libby, M. Kornicer, R. E. Mitchell, D. Besson, T. K. Pedlar, D. Cronin-Hennessy, J. Hietala, S. Dobbs, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, A. Tomaradze, T. Xiao, L. Martin, A. Powell, P. Spradlin, G. Wilkinson, J. Y. Ge, D. H. Miller, I. P. J. Shipsey, B. Xin, G. S. Adams, J. Napolitano, K. M. Ecklund, J. Insler, H. Muramatsu, C. S. Park, L. J. Pearson, E. H. Thorndike, S. Ricciardi, C. Thomas

School of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first flavor-tagged amplitude analysis of the decay D0 to the self-conjugate final state K+K-pi+pi- is presented. Data from the CLEO II.V, CLEO III, and CLEO-c detectors are used, from which around 3000 signal decays are selected. The three most significant amplitudes, which contribute to the model that best fits the data, are phirho0, K1(1270)+-K-+, and non-resonant K+K-pi+pi-. Separate amplitude analyses of D0 and D0-bar candidates indicate no CP violation among the amplitudes at the level of 5% to 30% depending on the mode. In addition, the sensitivity to the CP-violating parameter gamma/phi3 of a sample of 2000 B+ -> D0-tilde(K+K-pi+pi-)K+ decays, where D0-tilde is a D0 or D0-bar, collected at LHCb or a future flavor facility, is estimated to be (11.3 +/- 0.3) degrees using the favored model.

Original language	English
Article number	122002
Pages (from-to)	1-23
Number of pages	23
Journal	Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
Volume	85
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002
Publication status	Published - 14 Jun 2012

Keywords

charm physics
amplitude analysis
CP violation
gamma

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v85/i12/e122002

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Artuso, M., Blusk, S., Mountain, R., Skwarnicki, T., Stone, S., M. Zhang, L., Gershon, T., Bonvicini, G., Cinabro, D., Lincoln, A., J. Smith, M., Zhou, P., Zhu, J., Naik, P., Rademacker, J., M. Asner, D., W. Edwards, K., Randrianarivony, K., Tatishvili, G., ... Thomas, C. (2012). Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-. Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 85(12), 1-23. Article 122002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

@article{4a9de32e84d34d64a25cb2179d56ae7d,

title = "Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-",

abstract = "The first flavor-tagged amplitude analysis of the decay D0 to the self-conjugate final state K+K-pi+pi- is presented. Data from the CLEO II.V, CLEO III, and CLEO-c detectors are used, from which around 3000 signal decays are selected. The three most significant amplitudes, which contribute to the model that best fits the data, are phirho0, K1(1270)+-K-+, and non-resonant K+K-pi+pi-. Separate amplitude analyses of D0 and D0-bar candidates indicate no CP violation among the amplitudes at the level of 5\% to 30\% depending on the mode. In addition, the sensitivity to the CP-violating parameter gamma/phi3 of a sample of 2000 B+ -> D0-tilde(K+K-pi+pi-)K+ decays, where D0-tilde is a D0 or D0-bar, collected at LHCb or a future flavor facility, is estimated to be (11.3 +/- 0.3) degrees using the favored model.",

keywords = "charm physics, amplitude analysis, CP violation, gamma",

author = "M. Artuso and S. Blusk and R. Mountain and T. Skwarnicki and S. Stone and \{M. Zhang\}, L. and T. Gershon and G. Bonvicini and D. Cinabro and A. Lincoln and \{J. Smith\}, M. and P. Zhou and J. Zhu and P. Naik and J. Rademacker and \{M. Asner\}, D. and \{W. Edwards\}, K. and K. Randrianarivony and G. Tatishvili and \{A. Briere\}, R. and H. Vogel and \{U. E. Onyisi\}, P. and \{L. Rosner\}, J. and \{P. Alexander\}, J. and \{G. Cassel\}, D. and S. Das and R. Ehrlich and L. Gibbons and \{W. Gray\}, S. and \{L. Hartill\}, D. and \{K. Heltsley\}, B. and \{L. Kreinick\}, D. and \{E. Kuznetsov\}, V. and \{R. Patterson\}, J. and D. Peterson and D. Riley and A. Ryd and \{J. Sadoff\}, A. and X. Shi and \{M. Sun\}, W. and J. Yelton and P. Rubin and N. Lowrey and S. Mehrabyan and M. Selen and J. Wiss and J. Libby and M. Kornicer and \{E. Mitchell\}, R. and D. Besson and \{K. Pedlar\}, T. and D. Cronin-Hennessy and J. Hietala and S. Dobbs and Z. Metreveli and \{K. Seth\}, K. and A. Tomaradze and T. Xiao and L. Martin and A. Powell and P. Spradlin and G. Wilkinson and \{Y. Ge\}, J. and \{H. Miller\}, D. and \{P. J. Shipsey\}, I. and B. Xin and \{S. Adams\}, G. and J. Napolitano and \{M. Ecklund\}, K. and J. Insler and H. Muramatsu and \{S. Park\}, C. and \{J. Pearson\}, L. and \{H. Thorndike\}, E. and S. Ricciardi and C. Thomas",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002",

language = "English",

volume = "85",

pages = "1--23",

journal = "Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology",

issn = "1550-7998",

publisher = "American Physical Society (APS)",

number = "12",

}

Artuso, M, Blusk, S, Mountain, R, Skwarnicki, T, Stone, S, M. Zhang, L, Gershon, T, Bonvicini, G, Cinabro, D, Lincoln, A, J. Smith, M, Zhou, P, Zhu, J, Naik, P, Rademacker, J, M. Asner, D, W. Edwards, K, Randrianarivony, K, Tatishvili, G, A. Briere, R, Vogel, H, U. E. Onyisi, P, L. Rosner, J, P. Alexander, J, G. Cassel, D, Das, S, Ehrlich, R, Gibbons, L, W. Gray, S, L. Hartill, D, K. Heltsley, B, L. Kreinick, D, E. Kuznetsov, V, R. Patterson, J, Peterson, D, Riley, D, Ryd, A, J. Sadoff, A, Shi, X, M. Sun, W, Yelton, J, Rubin, P, Lowrey, N, Mehrabyan, S, Selen, M, Wiss, J, Libby, J, Kornicer, M, E. Mitchell, R, Besson, D, K. Pedlar, T, Cronin-Hennessy, D, Hietala, J, Dobbs, S, Metreveli, Z, K. Seth, K, Tomaradze, A, Xiao, T, Martin, L, Powell, A, Spradlin, P, Wilkinson, G, Y. Ge, J, H. Miller, D, P. J. Shipsey, I, Xin, B, S. Adams, G, Napolitano, J, M. Ecklund, K, Insler, J, Muramatsu, H, S. Park, C, J. Pearson, L, H. Thorndike, E, Ricciardi, S & Thomas, C 2012, 'Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-', Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 85, no. 12, 122002, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-

AU - Artuso, M.

AU - Blusk, S.

AU - Mountain, R.

AU - Skwarnicki, T.

AU - Stone, S.

AU - M. Zhang, L.

AU - Gershon, T.

AU - Bonvicini, G.

AU - Cinabro, D.

AU - Lincoln, A.

AU - J. Smith, M.

AU - Zhou, P.

AU - Zhu, J.

AU - Naik, P.

AU - Rademacker, J.

AU - M. Asner, D.

AU - W. Edwards, K.

AU - Randrianarivony, K.

AU - Tatishvili, G.

AU - A. Briere, R.

AU - Vogel, H.

AU - U. E. Onyisi, P.

AU - L. Rosner, J.

AU - P. Alexander, J.

AU - G. Cassel, D.

AU - Das, S.

AU - Ehrlich, R.

AU - Gibbons, L.

AU - W. Gray, S.

AU - L. Hartill, D.

AU - K. Heltsley, B.

AU - L. Kreinick, D.

AU - E. Kuznetsov, V.

AU - R. Patterson, J.

AU - Peterson, D.

AU - Riley, D.

AU - Ryd, A.

AU - J. Sadoff, A.

AU - Shi, X.

AU - M. Sun, W.

AU - Yelton, J.

AU - Rubin, P.

AU - Lowrey, N.

AU - Mehrabyan, S.

AU - Selen, M.

AU - Wiss, J.

AU - Libby, J.

AU - Kornicer, M.

AU - E. Mitchell, R.

AU - Besson, D.

AU - K. Pedlar, T.

AU - Cronin-Hennessy, D.

AU - Hietala, J.

AU - Dobbs, S.

AU - Metreveli, Z.

AU - K. Seth, K.

AU - Tomaradze, A.

AU - Xiao, T.

AU - Martin, L.

AU - Powell, A.

AU - Spradlin, P.

AU - Wilkinson, G.

AU - Y. Ge, J.

AU - H. Miller, D.

AU - P. J. Shipsey, I.

AU - Xin, B.

AU - S. Adams, G.

AU - Napolitano, J.

AU - M. Ecklund, K.

AU - Insler, J.

AU - Muramatsu, H.

AU - S. Park, C.

AU - J. Pearson, L.

AU - H. Thorndike, E.

AU - Ricciardi, S.

AU - Thomas, C.

PY - 2012/6/14

Y1 - 2012/6/14

N2 - The first flavor-tagged amplitude analysis of the decay D0 to the self-conjugate final state K+K-pi+pi- is presented. Data from the CLEO II.V, CLEO III, and CLEO-c detectors are used, from which around 3000 signal decays are selected. The three most significant amplitudes, which contribute to the model that best fits the data, are phirho0, K1(1270)+-K-+, and non-resonant K+K-pi+pi-. Separate amplitude analyses of D0 and D0-bar candidates indicate no CP violation among the amplitudes at the level of 5% to 30% depending on the mode. In addition, the sensitivity to the CP-violating parameter gamma/phi3 of a sample of 2000 B+ -> D0-tilde(K+K-pi+pi-)K+ decays, where D0-tilde is a D0 or D0-bar, collected at LHCb or a future flavor facility, is estimated to be (11.3 +/- 0.3) degrees using the favored model.

AB - The first flavor-tagged amplitude analysis of the decay D0 to the self-conjugate final state K+K-pi+pi- is presented. Data from the CLEO II.V, CLEO III, and CLEO-c detectors are used, from which around 3000 signal decays are selected. The three most significant amplitudes, which contribute to the model that best fits the data, are phirho0, K1(1270)+-K-+, and non-resonant K+K-pi+pi-. Separate amplitude analyses of D0 and D0-bar candidates indicate no CP violation among the amplitudes at the level of 5% to 30% depending on the mode. In addition, the sensitivity to the CP-violating parameter gamma/phi3 of a sample of 2000 B+ -> D0-tilde(K+K-pi+pi-)K+ decays, where D0-tilde is a D0 or D0-bar, collected at LHCb or a future flavor facility, is estimated to be (11.3 +/- 0.3) degrees using the favored model.

KW - charm physics

KW - amplitude analysis

KW - CP violation

KW - gamma

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84862284751

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122002

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

SN - 1550-7998

VL - 85

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

JF - Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

IS - 12

M1 - 122002

ER -

Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Particle physics equipment grant.

Consolidated Grant 2012-16

Wakeham Rebate for Rolling Grant 2010-11

Cite this

Amplitude analysis of D0→K+K-π+π-

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

Particle physics equipment grant.

Consolidated Grant 2012-16

Wakeham Rebate for Rolling Grant 2010-11

Cite this