An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations

Sean Myles; Mark Stoneking; Nicholas J Timpson

doi:10.1186/1755-8794-2-45

An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations

Sean Myles, Mark Stoneking, Nicholas J Timpson

Bristol Medical School (PHS)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal)

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumption in these cases is that the population under study has the same substructure as the population in which the AIMs were discovered. The present study assesses this assumption and evaluates the portability between worldwide populations of 10 SNPs found to be highly-differentiated within Britain (BritAIMs).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	45
Journal	BMC Medical Genomics
Volume	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-2-45
Publication status	Published - 2009

Access to Document

10.1186/1755-8794-2-45

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{6a2097cb320541219835a9888a6006a0,

title = "An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations",

abstract = "Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumption in these cases is that the population under study has the same substructure as the population in which the AIMs were discovered. The present study assesses this assumption and evaluates the portability between worldwide populations of 10 SNPs found to be highly-differentiated within Britain (BritAIMs).",

author = "Sean Myles and Mark Stoneking and Timpson, {Nicholas J}",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1186/1755-8794-2-45",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "45",

journal = "BMC Medical Genomics",

issn = "1755-8794",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations

AU - Myles, Sean

AU - Stoneking, Mark

AU - Timpson, Nicholas J

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumption in these cases is that the population under study has the same substructure as the population in which the AIMs were discovered. The present study assesses this assumption and evaluates the portability between worldwide populations of 10 SNPs found to be highly-differentiated within Britain (BritAIMs).

AB - Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumption in these cases is that the population under study has the same substructure as the population in which the AIMs were discovered. The present study assesses this assumption and evaluates the portability between worldwide populations of 10 SNPs found to be highly-differentiated within Britain (BritAIMs).

U2 - 10.1186/1755-8794-2-45

DO - 10.1186/1755-8794-2-45

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 19619313

VL - 2

SP - 45

JO - BMC Medical Genomics

JF - BMC Medical Genomics

SN - 1755-8794

ER -