Abstract
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of four tools that can be used to collect
user activity data (UAD) in machine translation post-editing (PE) research: Tobii Studio, Translog-II, TransCenter, and PET. These tools are analysed here based on empirical data as a way of providing a picture of what the current state of research has to offer in terms of technology and investigation methods. After an analysis of the features offered by the tools, a summary is drawn and potential room for improvement in the field is identified.
user activity data (UAD) in machine translation post-editing (PE) research: Tobii Studio, Translog-II, TransCenter, and PET. These tools are analysed here based on empirical data as a way of providing a picture of what the current state of research has to offer in terms of technology and investigation methods. After an analysis of the features offered by the tools, a summary is drawn and potential room for improvement in the field is identified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the MT Summit XIV Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice (WPTP-2) |
| Subtitle of host publication | Nice, September 2, 2013 |
| Pages | 93-101 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Sept 2013 |