An evaluation of tools for post-editing research: the current picture and further needs

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative evaluation of four tools that can be used to collect
user activity data (UAD) in machine translation post-editing (PE) research: Tobii Studio, Translog-II, TransCenter, and PET. These tools are analysed here based on empirical data as a way of providing a picture of what the current state of research has to offer in terms of technology and investigation methods. After an analysis of the features offered by the tools, a summary is drawn and potential room for improvement in the field is identified.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the MT Summit XIV Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice (WPTP-2)
Subtitle of host publicationNice, September 2, 2013
Pages93-101
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of tools for post-editing research: the current picture and further needs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this