Skip to content

An experimental evaluation of StatHand: A free application to guide students’ statistical decision making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-36
Number of pages14
JournalScholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
Issue number1
Early online date19 Mar 2019
DateAccepted/In press - 9 Nov 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 19 Mar 2019
DatePublished (current) - Mar 2019


Quantitative research methods underpin psychological literacy and evidence based practice in psychology. Despite this, many students struggle to identify appropriate statistics for different types of research questions and data types. StatHand (see is a free application that facilitates this statistical decision making process by prompting students to focus systematically on each structural characteristic of their research design. 217 undergraduate psychology students were randomised to use one of four decision making aids: StatHand on an iPad, a familiar textbook, a familiar paper decision tree, or the textbook and decision tree combined. Participants were then asked to identify suitable statistics for five research scenarios. Students assigned to use StatHand demonstrated higher decision making accuracy than users of the three alternative aids (δ = .50 to .64). StatHand users also experienced lower cognitive load, higher confidence in the accuracy of their decisions and greater satisfaction with their assigned aid than one or more of the other groups. However, it took the StatHand users longer to make their decisions. Finally, there was strong evidence to support the hypothesis that StatHand is instructionally efficient, and that its use requires less effort to promote higher performance relative to the other three aids (δ = .49 to .70). StatHand can be incorporated into a variety of classroom learning activities, and educators are encouraged to consider how they can use it most effectively.

    Research areas

  • mobile learning app, statistic selection, decision tree, instructional efficiency, Bayesian

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via APA at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 221 KB, PDF document

    Licence: Other


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups