Abstract
Breastmilk sharing via the internet has become more popular in recent years, with a resultant increase in media attention. It is actively discouraged by public health bodies in at least three countries. We undertook a qualitative analysis of worldwide English language news media (online newspaper articles and transcripts of television and radio pieces) focusing on peer-to-peer breastmilk sharing during a 24-month period (2015–2016). One hundred eleven news articles were analysed semiotically for positive (n = 49) and negative (n = 90) depictions of breastmilk sharing and the actors involved. Three countries published the majority of the articles: United States (n = 42), United Kingdom (n = 24) and Australia (n = 20). Topics associated with using shared breastmilk included perceived insufficiency, having surgery or taking medication, or the prematurity of the baby. Reports of women who gave and received breastmilk were largely positive although sometimes confused with women who sell breastmilk, who were demonised. The breastmilk itself, however, was considered as potentially contaminated and possibly dangerous; calls for action (n = 33) focused on increasing regulation and safety. Peer-to-peer milk sharing and the commercial availability of human milk are activities that occur within social and cultural contexts, and, as such, the ways in which they are represented in the news media reflect the ways in which they are also represented more widely in society. Increased understanding of normal infant feeding practices is needed, alongside guidance on how to better support breastfeeding. News media outlets can facilitate this through reporting risk in line with evidence. Further research should be undertaken to understand the safety of breastmilk sharing and the experience of those who participate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e13139 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Maternal and Child Nutrition |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Sally Dowling has previously received funding from the Economic and Social Research Council and from South Gloucestershire and Wiltshire Local Authorities. She is a co‐recipient of two internal research awards from UWE, Bristol (Vice Chancellor's Challenge Fund). Aimee Grant has received funding from the National Institute for Health Research, Economic and Social Research Council, the Wellcome Trust ISSF and the Welsh Crucible Small Grant Scheme. She has also undertaken paid consultancy for Public Health Wales NHS Trust, where she previously held the role of Senior Health Promotion Practitioner. She is affiliated with the Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) Wales Cymru research committee, where she previously held the role of Research and Policy Officer.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- breast milk
- breastfeeding
- human milk
- mass media
- qualitative research
- stigma
Access to Document
- Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley Open Access at https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13139 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.