Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

  • Anita Alexander
  • , Michael Barnett-Cowan
  • , Elizabeth Bartmess
  • , Frank A. Bosco
  • , Mark Brandt
  • , Joshua Carp
  • , Jesse J. Chandler
  • , Russ Clay
  • , Hayley Cleary
  • , Michael Cohn
  • , Giulio Costantini
  • , Jamie DeCoster
  • , Elizabeth Dunn
  • , Casey Eggleston
  • , Vivien Estel
  • , Frank J. Farach
  • , Jenelle Feather
  • , Susann Fiedler
  • , James G. Field
  • , Joshua D. Foster
  • Michael Frank, Rebecca S. Frazier, Heather M. Fuchs, Jeff Galak, Elisa Maria Galliani, Sara Garcia, Elise M. Giammanco, Elizabeth A. Gilbert, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Lars Goellner, Jin X. Goh, R. Justin Goss, Jesse Graham, James A. Grange, Jeremy R. Gray, Sarah Gripshover, Joshua Hartshorne, Timothy B. Hayes, Georg Jahn, Kate Johnson, William Johnston, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Calvin K. Lai, Daniel Lakens, Kristin Lane, Etienne P. LeBel, Minha Lee, Michael May, Marcus Munafo, Colin Tucker Smith, Open Sci Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

454 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practiced or published. The Reproducibility Project is an open, large-scale, collaborative effort to systematically examine the rate and predictors of reproducibility in psychological science. So far, 72 volunteer researchers from 41 institutions have organized to openly and transparently replicate studies published in three prominent psychological journals in 2008. Multiple methods will be used to evaluate the findings, calculate an empirical rate of replication, and investigate factors that predict reproducibility. Whatever the result, a better understanding of reproducibility will ultimately improve confidence in scientific methodology and findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-660
Number of pages4
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Research Groups and Themes

  • Brain and Behaviour
  • Tobacco and Alcohol
  • TARG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this