TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of interfacial micromechanics in microdroplet model composites using synchrotron microfocus X-ray diffraction
AU - Eichhorn, SJ
AU - Bennett, JA
AU - Shyng, YT
AU - Young, RJ
AU - Davies, RJ
PY - 2006/10/1
Y1 - 2006/10/1
N2 - Microfocus X-ray diffraction, a synchrotron radiation based technique, has been used to determine the fibre/matrix interfacial shear stress within a new type of model composite. This model composite comprises a single fibre of poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) or poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) with an epoxy resin microdroplet attached along its length. Shifts of meridional Bragg peaks as a function of stress have been determined for each fibre type and used as a calibration of fibre stress both inside and outside of the droplets. The variation of stress was mapped along the fibre in the microdroplet composites at different levels of applied stress. A modified single fibre pull-out shear lag analysis with an interfacial failure criterion was used to interpret the data. The microdroplet geometry, which is similar to the more established microbond test has several advantages; the primary advantage is that there is no need for a mechanical restraint on the droplet, as in a microbond test. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Microfocus X-ray diffraction, a synchrotron radiation based technique, has been used to determine the fibre/matrix interfacial shear stress within a new type of model composite. This model composite comprises a single fibre of poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) or poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) with an epoxy resin microdroplet attached along its length. Shifts of meridional Bragg peaks as a function of stress have been determined for each fibre type and used as a calibration of fibre stress both inside and outside of the droplets. The variation of stress was mapped along the fibre in the microdroplet composites at different levels of applied stress. A modified single fibre pull-out shear lag analysis with an interfacial failure criterion was used to interpret the data. The microdroplet geometry, which is similar to the more established microbond test has several advantages; the primary advantage is that there is no need for a mechanical restraint on the droplet, as in a microbond test. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
U2 - 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.007
DO - 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.007
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
SN - 0266-3538
VL - 66
SP - 2197
EP - 2205
JO - Composites Science and Technology
JF - Composites Science and Technology
ER -