Skip to content

Anatomy of the Ediacaran rangeomorph Charnia masoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-176
Number of pages20
JournalPapers in Palaeontology
Issue number1
Early online date11 Sep 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 13 May 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Feb 2019


The Ediacaran macrofossil Charnia masoni Ford is perhaps the most iconic member of the Rangeomorpha: a group of seemingly sessile, frondose organisms that dominates late Ediacaran benthic, deep-marine fossil assemblages. Despite C. masoni exhibiting broad palaeogeographic and stratigraphic ranges, there have been few morphological studies that consider the variation observed amongst populations of specimens derived from multiple global localities. We present an analysis of C. masoni that evaluates specimens from the UK, Canada and Russia, representing the largest morphological study of this taxon to date. We describe substantial morphological variation within C. masoni and present a new morphological model for this species that has significant implications both for interpretation of rangeomorph architecture, and potentially for existing taxonomic schemes. Previous reconstructions of Charnia include assumptions regarding the presence of structures seen in other rangeomorphs (e.g. an internal stalk) and of homogeneity in higher order branch morphology; observations that are not borne out by our investigations. We describe variation in the morphology of third and fourth order branches, as well as variation in gross structure near the base of the frond. The diagnosis of Charnia masoni is emended to take account of these new features. These findings highlight the need for large-scale analyses of rangeomorph morphology in order to better understand the biology of this long-enigmatic group.

    Research areas

  • Ediacaran, rangeomorph, morphology, intraspecific variation, taxonomy

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 24 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups