Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective

Elizabeth S. Paul*, Michael T. Mendl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

86 Citations (Scopus)
615 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing research interest in the field of animal emotion. But there is still little agreement about whether and how the word “emotion” should be defined for use in the context of non-human species. Here, we make a distinction between descriptive and prescriptive definitions. Descriptive definitions delineate the ways in which the word emotion is used in everyday life. Prescriptive definitions are used to pick out the set of events that scientific theories of emotion purport to explain. Picking out three prescriptive definitions, we show that the different ways in which emotions are defined correspond to processes that are distributed differentially across the animal kingdom. We propose that these definitions provide a useful starting point for investigating the varying emotional capacities of a wide range of animals, providing a basis for a new, comparative science of emotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-209
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume205
Early online date31 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Animal behaviour
  • Animal emotion
  • Consciousness
  • Definition
  • Emotion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this