Abstract
Medieval English law set the killing of a husband by his wife apart from most other homicides, because it was perceived as particularly serious and disruptive of the social order. Husband-killers were burned, not hanged, as a spectacular demonstration of condemnation and concern for this social problem. As this chapter shows, however, husband-killing also presented legal problems. There was a doctrinal puzzle in terms of the unclear extent to which this offence should be assimilated to treason, as opposed to homicide: the later distinction between ‘high treason’ against the king, crown or government, and ‘petty treason’ against a domestic superior did not come into being as neatly as sometimes assumed. There were also struggles on a procedural level, as attempts were made to fit husband-killing into common law modes of prosecution, prompting some creative strategies on the part of those seeking to secure a conviction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Law and Constitutional Change |
| Subtitle of host publication | Essays in Legal History |
| Editors | David Capper, Conor McCormick, Norma Dawson |
| Place of Publication | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Pages | 11-26 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009797733 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781009797740 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Oct 2025 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Centre for Law and History Research
Keywords
- Women, Legal History, Medieval Hisotry