Anthropomorphic Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Fatema Zaghloul*, Haiat Perozzo, Aurelio Ravarini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)

Abstract

As Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools become increasingly integrated into clinical practice, their anthropomorphic features raise important questions about their role, reliability and implications for human-centred care. This discussion article examines the concept of anthropomorphic GenAI, highlighting how its human-like traits may influence trust, professional judgement and the dynamics of patient care. While such technologies can enhance efficiency and support clinical decision-making, their design often blurs the line between simulation and authentic human understanding. This paper identifies key gaps in the existing literature, particularly around emotional intelligence, ethical reasoning, specialisation-specific adoption and the long-term impact of AI on clinical practice and proposes a structured research agenda to guide future inquiry and responsible innovation. By drawing attention to the promises and pitfalls of anthropomorphic AI in healthcare, this discussion invites interdisciplinary reflection on how such systems should be designed, evaluated and integrated into healthcare and clinical contexts.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Innovations
Early online date16 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropomorphic Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this