Applicability of diagnostic studies--statistics, bias and estimates of diagnostic accuracy

Jos Kleijnen, Marie Westwood, Penny Whiting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviewing and using diagnostic research for decision making involves complex issues about what are the exact diagnostic questions, how they should be studied, and to whom the results of such studies apply in real life. In this paper we aim to address some of the main issues concerning applicability of diagnostic research by looking at different diagnostic questions, what different study designs can be used and how bias and variability may impact on applicability. Users of diagnostic research should be aware of these issues in order to avoid confusion and misunderstandings about why modern diagnostic research addresses particular patient groups and uses certain study designs, whilst choosing to ignore others that at first glance seem relevant. We conclude that there are 4 main points to be addressed in doing and using diagnostic research, and these are: "Get the question right"; "Get the study design right"; "Include patients for whom the test will also be used in practice"; and "Educate users of research". Simple as they may seem, these points cover extremely complex issues in practice, and these need to be addressed by more communication between methodologists, practitioners and decision makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-503
Number of pages6
JournalZeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
Volume105
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Bias (Epidemiology)
  • Biomedical Research
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening
  • National Health Programs
  • Predictive Value of Tests

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Applicability of diagnostic studies--statistics, bias and estimates of diagnostic accuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this