Abstract
Ethically challenging situations are common in veterinary practice, and
they may be a source of moral stress, which may in turn impact the
welfare of veterinarians. Despite recognition of the importance of
ethical reasoning, some veterinary students may struggle to apply
theoretical ethical frameworks. Fraser developed a “practical” ethic
consisting of four principles that can be applied to ethically
challenging situations. We apply Fraser’s “practical” ethic to three
cases that veterinarians may encounter: animal hoarding, animal neglect,
and treatment of wildlife. We argue that Fraser’s “practical” ethic is
consistent with a One Welfare framework, and may have increasing
currency for veterinarians in the light of the World Animal Health
Organisation’s Global Animal Welfare Strategy. Both Fraser’s “practical”
ethic and a One Welfare framework require veterinarians to consider the
impacts of animal ethics decisions on a broader scale than most other
ethical frameworks have prepared them for. We discuss the strengths and
limitations of Fraser’s “practical” ethic when applied in veterinary
contexts and recommend additional support and training to enable
veterinarians to effectively apply these frameworks in real-world
settings
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 109 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Animals |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- Animal ethics
- Ethical frameworks
- Ethically challenging situations
- One welfare
- Practical ethic
- Veterinary
- Veterinary education