Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)
601 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Clinical and statistical heterogeneity are commonplace in meta-analysis of mental health interventions. One possible source of this heterogeneity is the complexity of the intervention being evaluated. Complexity may relate to the intervention, or to the way in which it is implemented; however, the most common interpretation of a complex intervention is one which has multiple, potentially interacting components. In this article we outline different analytical strategies suggested for incorporating intervention complexity in a meta-analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-21
Number of pages6
JournalEvidence-Based Mental Health
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date20 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Groups and Themes

  • ConDuCT-II
  • DECIPHer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • ConDuCT-II

    Blazeby, J. (Principal Investigator)

    1/04/1431/03/19

    Project: Research

  • Research Fellowship

    Caldwell, D. (Principal Investigator)

    1/01/111/12/15

    Project: Research

  • MRC METHODOLOGY RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP

    Welton, N. J. (Principal Investigator)

    4/05/094/11/13

    Project: Research

Cite this