Are palaeoscolecids ancestral ecdyszoans?

THP Harvey, XP Dong, PCJ Donoghue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)


The reconstruction of ancestors is a central aim of comparative anatomy and evolutionary developmental biology, not least in attempts to understand the relationship between developmental and organismal evolution. Inferences based on living taxa can and should be tested against the fossil record, which provides an independent and direct view onto historical character combinations. Here, we consider the nature of the last common ancestor of living ecdysozoans through a detailed analysis of palaeoscolecids, an early and extinct group of introvert-bearing worms that have been proposed to be ancestral ecdysozoans. In a review of palaeoscolecid anatomy, including newly resolved details of the internal and external cuticle structure, we identify specific characters shared with various living nematoid and scalidophoran worms, but not with panarthropods. Considered within a formal cladistic context, these characters provide most overall support for a stem-priapulid affinity, meaning that palaeoscolecids are far-removed from the ecdysozoan ancestor. We conclude that previous interpretations in which palaeoscolecids occupy a deeper position in the ecdysozoan tree lack particular morphological support and rely instead on a paucity of preserved characters. This bears out a more general point that fossil taxa may appear plesiomorphic merely because they preserve only plesiomorphies, rather than the mélange of primitive and derived characters anticipated of organisms properly allocated to a position deep within animal phylogeny.
Translated title of the contributionAre palaeoscolecids ancestral ecdyszoans?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177 - 200
Number of pages24
JournalEvolution and Development
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Structured keywords

  • MSc Palaeobiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Are palaeoscolecids ancestral ecdyszoans?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this